Environment and Sustainability
Committee
Inquiry into Energy Policy and
Planning in Wales
EPP 193 – L R Mytton
Response to Committee paper dated 2nd August 2011
1. It would be difficult to overestimate the importance of
dependable and affordable energy supplies to the economic and
physical well being of any nation. It therefore seems
reasonable to ask the Environment and Sustainability
Committee to start its review by establishing what elements of
energy policy and planning are devolved to WAG. If the
answer is none, the question then is by what authority does the
assembly aspire to have its own energy policy. By doing so it is
almost certain to bring Wales into conflict with national (British)
policy and create a dog’s dinner of the planning
system. This immediately brings into focus Technical Advice
Note 8 (TAN 8), the Assembly’s primary energy policy
instrument that, for all practical purposes, favors only one
renewable energy technology – wind farms. A technology
that spectacularly fails to deliver any of the primary criteria
that characterize sound energy production and distribution systems;
these are
a. They must be reliable, i.e. capable of supplying energy
when and where it is needed
b. Must be adequate. I.e. meet totality of demand.
c. Must be affordable.
2. The Welsh Government’s current policies and policy
instruments are based on aspirations set out in A Low Carbon
Revolution – Energy Policy Statement (2010).
- This document
aspires to a future based largely on natural renewable energy
resources – wind, wave, solar, biomass etc.
Unfortunately the majority of these energy resources fail to meet
the requirements of either 1a or 1b, or both. As a consequence they
all require alternative, more reliable support systems that make it
is entirely predictable that they will prove to be increasingly
costly. An unaffordable energy system will damage the
economy and drive growing numbers of people into fuel
poverty. Why would politicians choose to do this? The
answer is of course climate change.
- The UK.
Population 66 million produces around 2% of the words climate
change gases (CCG). Wales, population, 3 million produces a tiny
fraction of this 2%. I’m not against Wales doing its
bit on climate change, but it should be proportionate, especially
as Wales is the poorest of the UK’s nations. We should not be
driven into increasing poverty through ill-founded political
aspirations. Furthermore, the focus of climate change policy should
be reducing CCGs, not increasing the deployment of unaffordable
renewable energy technologies. Why, for example, do politicians
choose to force consumers to subsidies multination companies and
wealthy landowners to encourage the building of onshore wind farms?
Why not subsidise ordinary people to reduce their demand for
energy?
- The political
obsession with wind energy is difficult to understand. It’s
variable and unpredictable, so neither adequate nor dependable;
it’s wrecking the landscape; threatening wildlife, degrading
biodiversity, damaging tourism and trashing homes that people have
spent a lifetime paying for. Is a technology developed in the dark
ages and long ago abandoned by industry, really likely to make a
major contribution to dependable, adequate and affordable energy
supply in the 21st century? New developments in clean
fusion technology
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14842720
and
low energy nuclear reaction technology http://eandt.theiet.org/news/2011/aug/rossi-reactor.cfm
look set to
deliver abundant clean energy in the near future. WAG has
already back the wrong horse. It now needs to take a far more
pragmatic view on what energy production, and distribution systems
are needed to sustain the Welsh economy and the Welsh people in an
increasingly difficult economic climate.
L R
Mytton 22/8/11